Why not just use a free AI song generator?

Long answer

The technology behind this is no secret and we do not pretend otherwise. Anyone willing to sit down, learn a music AI tool, write their own lyrics with verses and rhymes and find the right style prompt will get to a comparable result. The only question is how many attempts and how many hours that takes.

The first difference is the words. You answer questions about the occasion, the person, your relationship and your memories, and out of that comes a set of lyrics with verses, a chorus and rhymes that actually work the details in rather than listing them. An empty prompt box assumes you can write lyrics yourself, and that is where most attempts fall down.

The second difference is the arrangement. Mood and style are matched to the occasion: a birthday song is allowed to be funny, a wedding song warm, a song for a funeral restrained. On top of that come small technical things you only learn after a few attempts, such as making the vocals start immediately instead of letting twenty seconds of intro run before the name arrives. Sound quality is the other half of it. Free tiers mostly hand out a short excerpt in a low bitrate, sometimes with a signal tone laid over it. What you get here is the finished recording as an MP3 at 320 kbit/s, good enough for a PA system in a hall.

The third difference is the rights. Free tools often grant private use only in their terms, reserve the right to show your creation publicly, or require a subscription as soon as you want to use the file commercially. Here you get an unrestricted usage right that expressly covers commercial use, and your song is not published.

For that you pay £24.99 once, and only after you have read the whole lyrics and heard the first 45 seconds. If you have the time and the appetite to learn the tools yourself, a free tool is cheaper. If you need a song for Saturday, you are done here in ten minutes.